|
Ruthless Pursuit of Power: 2010 Edition
Our In-Depth Look the Camaro SS's LS3
by
Hib Halverson, Content Director
|
 |
|
Image:
GMPT
Communications |
Chevrolet may
be last to enter the "neo-pony-car" market
segment with the 2010 Camaro, but, when you look
at its 6.2-liter, 422-horsepower LS3, optional
with six-speed manual in the SS models, as far
as power and fuel economy go; the 5th Generation
of one of America's iconic musclecars matches
anything Challenger or Mustang bring to the
table.
The new Camaro's
Generation Four Small-Block V8 has great genes. It's the
brother of the Vette's base V8 and a "little cousin" of
the ZR's 638-hp, supercharged, LS9 and the Z06's 505-hp,
LS7. Its ancestors are the LS1, in the '98-'02 Camaros,
and the LS6, used in a few 2002s.
The General Motors
Powertrain (GMPT) "Gen3" and "Gen4" V8s are some of the
World's great engines. Performance-wise, they beat
Ford's OHC V8s like a rented mule. They've been on
Ward's 10 Best Engines List not just once, but three
times since 1998.
Still not a believer? Ask Chrysler.
In the late-'90s, during it's development of the modern
"Hemi" V8, it benchmarked GM's Small-Block architecture,
then reproduced some aspects of it in the 5.7-liter Hemi
it introduced in 2002. Chrysler borrowing from that
design for V8s in its trucks and performance cars says
much about GM's engine technology. Some might be
disbelieving of the Gen 3 V8 being inspiring to a
competitor but, if you ever see the two short blocks
apart, side-by-side on a bench; the influence will be
noticeable. Imitation is the finest form of flattery.
Short Block Details
|
 |
|
From the outside, the LS3
case looks maybe a little like the last
Camaro's LS1 block. If you have sharp
eyes, you can see the larger bore, but
other major changes are inside. Image:
GMPT Communications. |
|
World-class
engines start with stout blocks or "cylinder
cases" as GM Powertrain engineers say. The LS3
case shares basics all aluminum Gen 3s and 4s
have had since they debuted in 1997:
deep-skirted, 319-T7 aluminum block with siamesed, cast-in-place, gray iron liners which
are centrifugally-cast to increase density and
allow thinner walls; long, 11-mm head bolts
threading deep into its main bearing webs and
six-bolt, sintered steel main bearing caps. All
this makes a lightweight, rigid, block structure
offering good durability and reduced friction. |
|
The 2010 Camaro SS's
376-cubic inch, LS3 uses the same case as the Corvette
ZR1's LS9, except for the "SC" engine's larger head bolt
threads, piston oilers, forged steel main caps and its
deck plate honing process. Other than that, everything
done for the LS9 block carries into the new Camaro's
LS3.
There are many
improvements in the LS3 case, compared to the
LS1/LS6 block in Camaros when production of the
4th Gen cars ended a little over 6 years ago.
First off, its liners have 4.065-in bores,
0.167-in larger than LS1, and its main bearing
webs are significantly stronger than those of
the Gen 3 block through improvements in cylinder
case design and manufacturing. |
|
 |
|
A bottom view of the
LS3's case shows the mountings for the
six-bolt, crossbolted, main caps. Image:
Steve Constable/GMPT. |
|
 |
|
One of the windows, as viewed from the
head deck. As the piston moves up and down in the
cylinder, the volume below the cylinder fluctuates
rapidly. The air blown in and out of the bay by that
causes significant oil windage. Windows in the webs
allow "bay-to-bay" breathing with much less windage in
the oil pan. Image: Steve Constable/GMPT.
|
|
 |
|
This "math art" shows the differences
between the pre-'09 block windows and the change in
windows for all Gen 4 blocks starting in 2009. The new
windows are larger in area and asymmetric in profile.
Image: GMPT Communications. |
|
About half that
additional strength comes from a redesign of the
"windows" between each cylinder's "bay" in the
crankcase. These windows enhance "bay-to-bay breathing"
in the interest of oil control and reduced parasitic
loss from crankcase windage. GMPT did a great deal of
finite element analysis (FEA) and other types of
computer modeling in search of a reliability/durability
margin at the LS9s, projected 656-hp similar to what
other Gen 4 engines had at their lower power outputs.
This research indicated that the windows in all three
center main webs could be strengthened by reshaping them
in a manner that altered the stress concentration in
each web. This reshaping, also, resulted in a slight
increase in their areas. "Those windows are larger and
have a non-symmetrical shape," Small-Block Assistant
Chief Engineer, Ron Meegan, told the Camaro Homepage.
"When we made them larger, we were able to move the edge
of the opening to a thicker portion of the bulkhead and
that is where the strength improvement comes from. We
were able to get to this sweet spot using finite element
analysis. We incrementally increased the size of the
window until we reached the maximum safety factor. If we
go larger than this, the safety factor begins to
decrease because the size of the hole overrides
improvement from the increasing thickness of the
bulkhead."
The net result of
the window alterations on Gen 4 blocks, which were done
in two stages, the first for the model year (MY) 2006
and the second for 2009, was an 18% increase in strength
of the webs.
 |
|
For Camaro engine geeks, this is the
Mother Ship, where most of the engine engineering is
done--GM Powertrain's World Headquarters in Pontiac,
Michigan. Image: CHpg Staff. |
|
 |
|
John Rydzewski is a
Camaro engine ace, both figuratively
and, as was the LS3's Assistant Chief
Engineer (ACE) for most of the engine's
development, literally. Rydzewski worked
on Camaro V8s as far back as 1993 and he
was ACE from 2005 to mid-'08. Image:
CHpg Staff. |
|
A while back, we
visited GMPT's World Headquarters in Pontiac, Michigan
to interview John Rydzewski, who was Assistant Chief
Engineer for Small-Block Passenger Car Engines until
July of '08, but has since been transferred to head a
future engine program. Rydzewski lead the team of
engineers who developed Camaro V8s and the one subject
we breached was the increased block strength. "When the
block is honed, the bottom of the honing tool needs
clearance so it doesn't contact the block below the
bore." Rydzewski explained. "Before the honing
operation, the block is machined in that area to provide
(hone over-travel) clearance. The resulting surface
geometry has a big impact on the block structure. The
hone over-travel clearance used to be machined with a
3-mm radius. With LS7, to get more strength in that
area, we changed to a more gentle, 8-mm radius. That was
a big durability enabler at the LS7's power level. When
we got into the LS3 finite element analysis (FEA), we
found our safety factor needed some improvement, so we
applied what we learned about LS7's hone over-travel
cut-out. We were able to increase the radius to 10-mm
which was worth about an 20% improvement (compared with
blocks having the 3-mm radius) in the strength of the
block structure in that area."
|
In the interest of simplicity,
starting in MY09, all Gen 4 blocks are now machined with
the window changes and 10-mm. hone-over-travel radius.
At the Camaro LS3's power levels, the cumulative result
of these changes increase main web strength by about 36%
compared to that of the LS1 used in the '98-'02, 4th Gen
Camaros.
 |
| |
|
 |
|
These changes to the main bearing webs in
an LS3 case (right) might not look like much, but they
make a huge difference in the strength of the lower end
of the block. Image: Steve Constable/GMPT. |
|
In Camaro LS1 and LS6
blocks, the bores were siamesed except for the top 20
millimeters or so which had a small slot through which
coolant flowed. That slot was there because, at the top
of the bore, where the most heat is generated, extra
cooling was required. It's important for bore wall and
piston temperatures to be as consistent and as cool as
possible. If the bore has hot spots, distortion will
result and that's not good for compression, oil control
or friction, so, with Gen 3, to reduce distortion of
upper ends of the liners between cylinders; coolant
flowed between the bores. The downside of that was
manufacturing complexity and some weakness in the block
in the vicinity of those slots.
|
During the Gen 4
development, the water jacket design was improved to get
good heat rejection without water between the bores.
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), one of GM
Powertrain's computer analysis tools, allowed the
Small-Block Team to model coolant flow in the water
jackets and project the quality of bore cooling if the
design was altered. CFD can examine water flow profiles,
movement of particles in the water and where eddies or
divergent flows occur. Engineers can see coolant flow on
a computer display and that enables them to more easily
predict the effect of water jacket improvements. Once a
particular change demonstrates effectiveness in the
virtual world, it can be quickly applied to actual
hardware. |
|
 |
|
The LS3 block from the
top side. The pairs of bosses adjacent
to #1, 4, 6 and 7 cylinders are for the
AFM hardware. Image: Steve
Constable/GMPT. |
|
The resulting changes
to block cooling enabled the slots to be eliminated for
Gen 4. The resulting heat rejection did the same or
better job with cooling and controlling bore distortion,
but also resulted in a case that is reliable and durable
at any of the Gen 4 power levels, up to the LS9's
638-hp.
|
 |
|
The LS3 connecting rod is
based on the original LS1 forging. GMPT
has used powdered metal rods since the
Gen 2 Small-Block years. Steel powder is
poured into a mold which is then heated
and subjected to great pressure. This
"sinters" the steel into the rod form.
From there the rod goes through a
conventional forging process and
shotpeening. Image: CHpg Staff. |
|
Another major change
was the addition of structure to the block valley to
accommodate the hardware for Active Fuel Management
(AFM), the Gen 4 Small-Block's cylinder deactivation
system. It will not be used in the Camaro LS3, but will
be in the L99, the car's, 396-hp automatic trans V8. The
knock sensors, previously atop the valley cover on an
LS1, moved to the sides of the block to make room for
AFM pieces. In addition, the extensive FEA the Gen 4
cylinder case underwent resulted numerous, other, small
structural changes to the casting which improved
strength and decreased mass. |
LS3's nodular iron,
rolled-fillet-journal crankshaft is similar to those
used in LS1 and LS6 engines except for counter weights
altered to rebalance the engine for a slightly heavier
piston. The connecting rod is basically the same–6.1"
long, PF1159M powdered steel, sintered, hot-forged, and
shotpeened–as in the LS1, except it now has a slightly
larger small-end which enables it to be bushed for a
floating pin, a change made to reduce cold piston knock
and as a reliability/durability enhancement at the
422-hp level. These rods are "net shape" so
post-production machine work for balancing is not
required. As before, they're "cracked rods" which means
that, to simplify manufacturing and enhance fit between
rod and cap, the big end is fractured in half rather
than cut and machined.
|
 |
|
Rods with cracked or
"fracture-split" big ends are common on
modern engines. The fracturing creates a
unique interface that "locks" together
only one way and does so very precisely.
The more accurate interface ensures a
uniform big end diameter and shape.
Image: CHpg Staff. |
|
 |
|
Starting with the LS2,
Gen 4 V8s use a full-floating wrist pin,
so the rods are silicon-bronze bushed
and that bushing has an oil feed groove
milled into it. Image: CHpg Staff.. |
|
Also new are the rod
bolts. They're made of stronger material which meets the
same grade 12.9 specification as do LS7 and LS9 bolts.
The design of the rod bolt was changed, too.
"An alignment feature
was added to the shank of the fastener,"
John Rydzewski told the
Camaro Homepage.
"Unique threads are rolled into a short length of the
shank. Compared to the standard threads, they have a
larger outer diameter which provides alignment to the
rod hole and they have a smaller minor diameter which
provides an additional benefit of isolating much of the
plastic deformation from yield to this rolled section of
the fastener.
|
 |
|
The LS3 rod bolt uses two
different thread sizes and diameters to
control bolt stretch. Image: CHpg Staff. |
|
"A connecting rod bolt
will have deformation along the length of the
fastener which results in concentrated stress at
the first engaged thread. Since unengaged bolt
threads are able to freely stretch, while
engaged threads are constrained by the threads
in the rod, the first engaged threads are more
highly stressed. |
"The new Small Block
bolt is similar to a 'necked-down' fastener, where the
bolt stretch/deformation will be focused in a portion of
the length of the bolt not near the first thread of
engagement. Therefore, the concentrated stresses at the
first thread of engagement will be less and the overall
joint safety factor improves."
The grade 12.9
material coupled with the improved bolt design,
allows clamp load at the rod cap interface to go from 47
kilonewtons to 50kN.
|
More cutting-edge
technology is in the LS3 piston and ring package. The
piston is a flattop design, cast with a hypereutectic,
aluminum/silicon alloy containing traces of copper and
nickel. Its ring grooves are machined with a slight
upward tilt which was increased by 0.25° over what was
used in the LS1. The top ring's tilt disappears as the
ring land flexes under the pressure of combustion such
that sealing and oil control are optimized. The other
two grooves' tilt enhances the ability of the second and
the oil rings to scrape oil off the cylinder walls. To
further improve oil control, the LS3 piston has four
holes drilled in its skirt, just below the oil ring
groove, downwards into its interior. These holes, two
adjacent to the major thrust surface and two adjacent to
the minor thrust surface, improve oil drainage from
below the oil ring. |
|
 |
|
In the early LS1 years,
because of the Gen 3/4 engine family's
short-skirted pistons, cold piston knock
was a customer pleasability issue. Since
the '02 LS6, Gen 3/4 pistons have had a
polymer coating on their major and minor
thrust surfaces–the gray area on this
LS3 piston skirt. At the end of the
break-in period, a lot of the polymer
and a slight amount of piston material
is worn away, leaving a very consistent
skirt surface, a nominal (and tight)
piston-to-bore clearance and hopefully,
no cold piston knock. Image: Steve
Constable/GMPT Communications. |
|
 |
|
Here's a "bare" LS3 piston. The
hard-anodizing adjacent to the top ring groove is a
durability feature. While the oil drainback notches have
been in Gen 3/4 pistons for a long time, new are the oil
drainback holes, two each, above the major and minor
thrust faces, drilled into the piston interior. Image:
CHpg Staff.
|
|
 |
|
The underside of the LS3
piston. As the piston moves down in the
bore, oil is scraped off the walls by
the oil ring then is "flushed" down the
oil holes and into the interior of the
piston. Image: CHpg Staff. |
|
To enhance durability,
surfaces either side of the top ring groove are
hard-anodized. The piston skirts are coated with the
antifriction polymer introduced on LS6 for MY02.
Interestingly, the pistons are installed with -2 micron
(-.00008-in or negative eight hundred-thousandths of an
inch) piston-to-bore "clearance"–a slight interference
fit. During break-in, some of the coating wears away,
leaving a nominal piston-to-bore clearance. LS3 pistons
use new wrist pins having tapered inside diameters, an
idea straight from the Corvette C5R race program and
which reduces pin weight with no loss in strength.
 |
|
The LS3 uses a wrist pin with a tapered
inside diameter. The benefit is reduced weight. because
the farther the pin penetrates into the piston pin bore,
the less strength is needed in the pin wall, the
tapering does not affect reliability/durability. Image:
CHpg Staff.
|
|
 |
|
The LS3 piston and ring
package is typical of what GMPT has used
since 2002 in high-performance SBV8
applications, but with more groove
"tilt" and higher oil ring tension.
Image: CHpg Staff. |
|
Oil control at high rpm
has been a challenge with Gen 3/4 engines. Since 1997,
to that end, GM has tried several combinations of
positive crankcase ventilation systems, ring tension and
oil pans. It has also changed the ring groove design as
detailed above.
 |
|
656.16) The top ring is the most critical
part of compression sealing and, in an LS3, it's a
pretty trick part with one of those tricks being a
slight twist to the ring. Drawing: CHpg Staff.
|
|
 |
|
With the rings in
simulated position on a piston, you can
easily see the hook-like, Napier-faced,
second ring. "Napier rings" are much
better at scrapping oil off the cylinder
walls as the piston moves down and
that's the reason GM upgraded to them
for 2002. Image: CHpg Staff. |
|
For the LS3, the ring
package has, once again, been changed. The top ring is
still moly-faced steel and "coin twisted," which means
its shape in side view is slightly conical to improve
the ring's sealing when under combustion pressure. The
second ring remains cast iron with the "Napier" face
introduced in MY02 and they both are 1.5-mm. wide with
the same tension as before. The oil ring is still
three-piece, two rails and an expander, however, to
improve oil control in the LS3, its tension was
increased.
When engineers talk
about "oil control", they mean control, not only in the
oil pan, to keep the oiling system from sucking air, and
control by piston ring and ring groove design; they mean
oil control through the crankcase ventilation system,
too. There are two sides to any PCV system, the "fresh
side", where air goes into the crankcase and the "foul
side," where dirty air comes out. On Gen 4 engines, both
sides have oil separators. The foul side separator is
the most important because that's where there is oil in
the crankcase ventilation flow virtually all the time.
Blow-by goes in the crankcase, through the foul-side
separator then is consumed in the engine.
LS3 has a new design
for that separator. It shares the same location as the
LS1's, but internally, it's quite different. Once again,
computational fluid dynamics played a part in
development, but this time, with the addition of some
proprietary GM software code called “Rain Drop
Analysis”. CFD with RDA is able model the flow of air in
which oil is suspended as it goes through separator. The
data gained from that helped engineers develop baffles
which would better separate the oil from the air. This
unique oil/air separator design is so effective that it
was patented. At the time rain drop analysis was paired
with CFD for the initial Gen 4 development in 2002, it
was a revolutionary computer modeling tool. Even today,
few companies utilize it because of the immense computer
power necessary to run it.
Ideally, you want to
separate all the oil and return it to the crankcase and
only have the engine ingest air and blow-by gases. In
practice, you burn some oil, but it needs to be as
little as possible. It there's too much oil in the PCV
flow, oil consumption will rise. With the LS1, when
there was a lot of air moving through the PVC system at
high speed but the engine was only lightly loaded; the
system wasn't efficient at separating the oil from the
air, so those engines suffered higher oil consumption
than engineers and some 4 Gen Camaro owners would have
liked.
Not only does the LS3
have significant improvement in its foul-side, oil/air
separator, it also has less blow-by air flow under those
conditions. Less blow-by under high-rpm/light-load
conditions and a more effective separator means less oil
consumption.
At high-rpm and
wide-open-throttle, blow-by flow can reach the capacity
of the foul side. That capacity cannot be so large that
it would never be exceeded because it's undesirable to
constantly consume large quantities of crankcase air
through the intake side of the engine. You want to
consume only enough that you're constantly purging the
crankcase vapors adequately. At light load, there is an
assist from manifold vacuum which insures constant
crankcase purging. That reduces sludge formation and
burns hydrocarbon pollution.
|
 |
|
The Camaro LS3 oil pan
with its engine oil cooler attached.
Image: GM Powertrain. |
|
At WOT, there is no
vacuum to help pull the air from the crankcase and,
also, there is more blow-by; so you exceed the flow
capacity of the foul side, which is sized for most
normal light load operation.
Often there is enough
blow-by at WOT that the clean-side air flow reverses. If
that happens, it might force oil into the intake. That's
why Gen 4 has oil/air separation on both the clean and
the foul sides.
|
The oil pan used on the
Camaro LS3 is quite a bit different than the one used on
LS1s in the 4 Gen cars and it's different from the one
used by the LS3 when it was introduced on the Corvette
for 2008. The Camaro pan is a bit bigger inside holding
a additional two quarts of oil compared to the Vette
LS3. Otherwise, the pan is similar in concept to other
Gen 3/4 oil pans in that, besides holding all the oil,
it acts as a sound insulator and add some rigidity to
the bottom of the block. In addition, the Camaro LS3 has
an engine oil cooler because, according to ACE Ron
Meegan, "...of the (vehicle) weight and the
(reduced) air flow around the engine in this
package, some of the more aggressive driving modes
required us to use a cooler to meet our oil temperature
requirements." The Camaro oil cooler is the same
type of oil-to-coolant heat exchanger used by the
supercharged LSA in the Cadillac CTS-V and it is mounted
in a similar location, on the left side of the oil pan.
|