|
The Camaro Homepage Interview Series #2
Camaro Product Manager, Cheryl Pilcher
by the CHpg Staff
|
Chevrolet hasn't actually
made a car in years.
More than a decade ago, over several of General Motor's
infamous "reorgs", all its car divisions shed their
engineering and manufacturing responsibilities and were
refocused solely on research, marketing and sales of
cars and trucks which were "made for them" by new GM
entities devoted only to engineering or manufacturing. |
 |
|
Camaro's engineering and
marketing expert,
Cheryl Pilcher. Image: Tom Henry. |
|
While there are no longer thousands of people at
"Chevrolet Engineering" there are still engineers and
hardcore product specialists at Chevrolet. They decide,
from an engineering perspective, what a Chevy Camaro
needs to be and then, during the design, engineering and
development processes, communicate those needs to the
"folks over in engineering" along with facilitating
communication back, the other way.
Don't kid yourself. This is no easy job. Not only do
the people responsible for that task on a car like the
Fifth-Generation Camaro need to be skilled engineers (so
they can understand, say--how the new car's engine will
meet "Bin4 emissions), but they must have marketing
experience (so they can understand why a V6 Sport Coupe
is the most important model in the line), they need to
have excellent communicative and leadership skills (so
they interface effectively between Chevrolet and GM's
engineering organization), they need to have grace under
pressure (so they can keep engineers, who sometimes say,
"Those people at Chevy don't know what they need", and
the marketing folks, who sometimes say, "Those people in
engineering won't give us what we need." all working
together effectively) and, last but certainly not
least...they need to be Camaro enthusiasts.
The
top person at Chevrolet responsible for engineering and
product issues related to the new Camaro is Cheryl
Pilcher. Not only does she have the engineering
credentials, the marketing skills, the communications
savvy but, she's worked on Camaros since going to work
for GM in 1986 and been smitten with the car the whole
time. Does this make her the Camaro Nation's "Wonder
Woman"?
That
just might be the case.
In
the Spring of 2007, the Camaro Homepage staff sat down
with Mrs. Pilcher near her office in Detroit, Michigan
for a lengthy, comprehensive discussion on the state of
the Camaro program.
What
follows is the first of this three-part interview.
|
 |
|
"Camaro is a sports car. Its buyers are
a specific audience. (They) are not
folks who will seek-out hybrids." Image:
CHpg Staff. |
|
Camaro Homepage:
First question. If you didn't get coffee this
morning, this'll wake you right up. What's
Chevrolet to do if, by early next decade, V8
performance cars become "undesirable" in a
market influenced by the greens' evangelistic
advocacy of "global warming" and fuel economy
and alternate fuels becoming social/political
issues?
Cheryl Pilcher:
Camaro is a sports car. Its buyers are a
specific audience. (They) are not necessarily
folks who will seek-out hybrids, biofuels or
things like that.
We're well-aware of fuel economy initiatives and
global warming. Any technologies available
today, or even technologies that need to be
developed; we're working on them.
Again, this is a sports car, so where it's
appropriate, I see us applying those
technologies but, I don't believe a Camaro is
the right place for, say, a hybrid (powertrain).
That's just not right. |
Now,
active fuel management, for fuel economy improvements,
or E85, to help us use less of gasoline? Those are
things we would consider because they might be right for
Camaro.
CHpg:
No hybrid powertrain.
CP:
(laughs) No hybrids
CHpg:
You were born and raised in Michigan?
CP:
Yes. My Father worked for General Motors, so I grew up
loving cars. We lived in West Bloomfield. I haven't gone
very far from my home base.
CHpg:
What high school?
CP:
Andover High School in Bloomfield Hills.
CHpg:
You went to the University of Michigan, and your degree
is in?
CP:
Mechanical Engineering.
CHpg:
ME from the U of M. Minor in anything?
CP:
No
CHpg:
Girl, I think you minored in "Camaro"
CP:
Yeah (laughs) Actually, I should say I "minored in
sports cars".
I
always loved sports cars. When I graduated from college,
the first car I bought was an '86 Trans Am. It wasn't a
Camaro but it was as close as you could get. At the
time, my Father worked for Pontiac, so it was the right
thing to do politically, too. I loved that car.
As I
worked in (vehicle) development, I realized: oh my gosh,
I'm driving brand new Camaros and Firebirds. Why do I
have my own just sitting in my garage? Eventually, I
sold that car. I had the luxury of driving development
cars all the time. What a dream job!
CHpg:
Ok,
let's get more into your career at GM. We met at the
1993 Camaro launch but I know you worked on the car
before that.
CP:
After I graduated from University of Michigan, my first
General Motors assignment was F-car Development, a dream
assignment.
Chpg:
When
was that?
CP:
1986. I was at the Milford Proving Ground (GM's
4000-acre test facility, 23 miles west of Detroit),
working in the development group. It was an exciting
time. We were working on the third-generation
(1982-1991) car in maintenance mode, following-up on
miscellaneous items, but we knew the 4th-gen car was
coming.
I
was really interested in aerodynamics and the wind
tunnels. As we started on the '93 car, I got the
opportunity to work on wind noise. That may sound simple
but, because you have such an aerodynamic car, things
like outside-mirror wind noise became a big concern.
CHpg:
So, when a car has good aero, things that stick out make
a much bigger...
CP:...noise.
Yeah. It causes people to be able to pinpoint a noise
source, so you want a "zero dB mirror"--no noise
associated with it.
Also, the windshield wipers for the 4th generation car
were an issue. We had to develop what we called "beauty
panels"--maybe a misnomer because it was a prominent
element forward of the wipers--to help get the airflow,
up and over them, so we didn't have turbulence around
the wipers causing noise. I did work on drag
development, too--all sorts of fun things in the wind
tunnel.
I
worked on squeaks and rattles, which might seem funny,
but they drive customers crazy when they've got an itch
or a squeak in the instrument panel or something in the
door. I got to work under the hood, on suspension
components, on the underbody and all over the interior.
It's amazing, all the different noise sources. For
example: a stabilizer bar bushing squawk that you hear
in colder temperatures. You're trying to figure out what
kind of material can we use to stop the noise and yet
maintain the suspension performance?
So,
it was a great opportunity. I think of those kinds of
jobs as: "jack-of-all-trades, expert-in-none." You're a
little bit of everything. You're in-touch with the whole
car.
So
that was my start on Camaro at the Proving Ground.
|
CHpg:
F-car Development on aero and squeaks and
rattles. Then what?
CP:
I spent about nine years at the Proving Ground.
Then, I went to Pontiac on what would become
the, all-new, 2000 Bonneville. I got to spend a
little time on sedan work. In 1996, I came back
to Camaro and worked at Chevrolet as the
Assistant Brand Manager for Product.
CHpg:
You were working with Scott (Settlemire,
formerly, Camaro Assistant Brand Manager for
Marketing and now the Director of Chevrolet
Shows and Exhibits who continues to guard the
fire of the Camaro Nation) |
|
 |
|
"It was a great
opportunity. I think of those kinds of
jobs as: 'jack-of-all-trades.' You're
in-touch with the whole car."
Image: CHpg Staff. |
|
CP:
I remember when we hired Scott Settlemire. No doubt he
was the guy for the job. His enthusiasm was beyond
apparent. Scott and I were counterparts. I, on the
product side, and he, on the marketing side. I learned
much from him about Camaro's history.
I
worked there from 96 to 98 on some of the minor changes
we did for '97, the bigger changes in '98 and on the SS.
Shortly after, I, also, started working on the C5
Corvette. That workload kind of took over and I ended-up
going on to the C6.
CHpg:
What'd you do on Corvette?
CP:
Similar position to what I have now. I was the liaison
between Chevrolet and engineering, a product manager who
helps identify: what content we want in the next
generation Corvette? What's most important to those
customers? The wonderful thing about Corvette, just like
Camaro, is that we get a lot of time with enthusiasts at
different events. Nowadays, lots of input from
websites...
|
 |
|
In Pilcher's time at
Chevrolet on the Corvette, she worked on
the launch of the 2001 Corvette Z06.
Shown is an early production "C5Z"
during the car's media launch at
Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course in the Spring
of 2000. Image: CHpg Staff. |
|
CHpg:
Ya think?!
CP:
We get so much good data. It's valuable to hear
what people want.
CHpg:
When were you at Corvette?
CP:
'98 through 2002. We were doing the Z06
launch--C5 Z06--and planning C6.
CHpg:
What'd you do after Corvette? |
CP:
A short stint as the TrailBlazer Marketing Manager. That
was a great assignment for an engineer, to work in the
marketing arena and understand what goes on behind the
scenes with advertising, incentive plans, promotions.
That's a benefit of General Motors. It is so large that,
if you're an engineer, you get to experience those
(different) areas and it was something I wanted to do.
Then, I had some children--twins. I have four-year old
twins. A boy and a girl. And then, I have a
two-and-a-half-year old little girl. I came back in '05
(to Camaro) and, since we were starting work on the
Camaro concept, I was thrilled. That was just the plum
assignment in my mind, to work on the car that I had
started with.
CHpg:
That covers your career and building a family. Now,
you're on Camaro, but you don't own a Camaro.
CP:
That’s true. Don't own a Camaro right now. But I can
tell you what my favorite is.
CHpg:
What?
|
CP:
The '93 Pace Car--the black and white car. I was
reflecting this morning why that car has always
been my favorite. First of all, I know how much
work we put into the '93 F-car. To see it come
to fruition was really cool. Then, I love black
and white. It's such a great contrast. There was
so much put into that Pace Car that made it
different than some of the other pace cars we've
done. It's just an excellent execution of a pace
car. So that's my favorite. |
|
 |
|
Pilcher's
Favorite: the 1993 Camaro Z/28
Indianapolis Pace Car.
Image: GM Communications. |
|
CHpg:
Ok, let's turn up the heat a bit. It's still going to be
about 24 months before anyone can get a 2010 production
unit...
CP:
One
thing...at this point, we've not announced a model year.
Right now, we're terming it the "new" Camaro.
CHpg:
Let me restate...it will be two years before we can get
a production version of the
new
Camaro. Then, you have Mustang, a "retro" exercise which
will have been in production for four years. There's
gonna be this Challenger--way, way retro--and the
Concepts have a kinda-sorta relation to PT Cruiser,
Chevy HHRs and the, unfortunately unsuccessful, Chevy
SSR.
All
these choices, inspired by cars from past. Are you
worried this retro stuff might peak before your first
Camaro rolls on a sales floor?
CP:
There's no doubt that the Concept (Chief Designer) Tom
Peters and the design team (styled) is a Camaro. In my
mind, that's success. It goes back to some first
generation (styling) cues, but it's a contemporary
interpretation of them. I call it: an evolutionary
design done in a contemporary way.
Older folks, who remember the first generation Camaros
and think that was the best time ever, will see it as a
positive. Yet, I've gone to auto shows with the Concept
Cars and, as I stand around and listen, I've been amazed
that a lot of folks in their 20s, they just love it
'cause it's a good lookin' car. They don't remember the
'69, but they say, "My God. That's a sexy car. I've
gotta have it."
So
I'm not concerned. I don't think that Chevrolet is
concerned. We don't think of the Concept Car as "retro".
It's a much more contemporary interpretation.
|
 |
|
The Dodge Challenger
Concept Car, the exterior of which is
said to be very close to the 2008
Challenger production model.
Image: Chrysler, LLC. |
|
CHpg:
I use "retro" figuratively. Tom made it clear in
the interview we did with him a year ago that
it's "inspired by" the '69 Camaro, so let's say
that. The '69 Mustang "inspired" the current
Mustang. The '70 Challenger inspires the
Challenger
CP:
And, that's a very literal interpretation on the
Challenger.
CHpg:
Indeed. There's little that's visually new on
the Dodge. |
CP:
And, I have no idea what their (Chrysler, LLC) thoughts
were behind that car but I suspect that was a purposeful
decision on their part.
As
Tom Peters elaborated, it
is
a Camaro we're designing and we can't ignore history, so
I think it's important to get the right amount of
heritage cues in the car, but it's not a literal
interpretation of the '69 Camaro. There may be people
disappointed in that, but by far, the majority love the
look.
I
think there's always going to be a place for "inspired
by". It's characteristics each generation that continue
on, but not in a literal sense. The Camaro Concept
taillamps and the way we've got the four lamps there. It
just gives you enough recognition of, yes, this is a
Camaro, but it's not very literal. It's important to me,
as a Chevrolet member, that people recognize the car as
a Camaro. I think it's ok--I think "inspired by" is ok.
The
Challenger will be, as the showcar demonstrated, a very
literal interpretation of the 1970 Challenger. I think
Mustang has different components of its different
generations in the current design. The Camaro Concept is
probably the least "inspired-by". It seems to have the
most newness.
|
CHpg:
You put Camaro past Mustang on the "newness
scale"?
CP:
I would say so. It has some cues from the 1st
Gen car. Overall, it looks like a Camaro but
it's done in a really fresh way. I see some
Corvette cues, as well--the strong rear
quarters--that, to me, is a positive.
CHpg:
Camaro is some type of relative of a Corvette,.
CP:
Definitely. In some cases we talk about "big
brother Corvette". In fact, whether it's
technology or styling cues Tom Peters is able to
bring to us because of Corvette; there's
definitely a relationship and I think there
always will be.
CHpg:
Camaro almost was the child that ate its mother
because, at one time, there was talk of Corvette
and Camaro on the same architecture.
CP:
I'm glad that that never happened. |
|
 |
|
"We talk about 'big
brother Corvette'. There's
definitely a relationship and I
think there always will be." Image:
CHpg Staff. |
|
Click Here for Part 2 of this
Interview |